DOI: 10.18503/1995-2732-2026-24-3-156-163
Abstract
Problem Statement (Relevance). The paper addresses the pressing issue of ensuring the stability and quality of the wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) process, which limits its widespread implementation in critical manufacturing applications. Conventional non-destructive testing methods, applied after the completion of the process, do not allow timely process adjustment. Objectives. The study is aimed at developing an integrated diagnostic approach based on in-situ monitoring for predictive process control. For this purpose, a method for synchronous multiparametric recording of key physical fields has been proposed, including electrical arc characteristics (voltage and current) and acoustic emission (AE) signals. During the experimental studies, wall-shaped specimens have been deposited while the corresponding data have been recorded simultaneously. The analysis has included the construction of spectrograms and phase portraits (energy-acoustic attractors), as well as the evaluation of their fractal dimensions to identify indicators of process stability and defect formation. Originality. The novelty of the study lies in the integration of multiparametric data and the application of deep neural network models for real-time data analysis. A comparative analysis of various architectures, including convolutional and recurrent neural networks, has been performed to classify process states based on raw and processed signals. The best result, with an accuracy of 91%, has been achieved by a bidirectional recurrent neural network (BiLSTM) using pre-calculated nonlinear signal parameters (fractal dimension and spectral entropy) as key features. This enables the model to effectively identify subtle patterns preceding the loss of process stability. Practical Relevance. The study provides a basis for an intelligent predictive control system capable of forecasting process instability within fractions of a second. This paves the way for closed-loop adaptive control systems, which are critical for the industrial implementation of WAAM, enabling both quality control and real-time optimization of process parameters. Further development will involve integrating the trained model into the process control system and validating the proposed approach across a wider range of materials and deposition parameters.
Keywords
wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM), predictive control, in-situ monitoring, acoustic emission, deep learning, fractal analysis, dynamic stability, nonlinear dynamics, multiparametric diagnostics, recurrent neural network (RNN), phase portrait, intelligent control, deposition quality.
For citation
Anosov M.S., Shatagin D.A., Baevsky A.A., Poduvaltsev A.A., Arkhipov M.V., Yamgulin R.I. Development of an Integrated Approach to the Diagnostics of Welding and Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing Processes. Vestnik Magnitogorskogo Gosudarstvennogo Tekhnicheskogo Universiteta im. G.I. Nosova [Vestnik of Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University]. 2026, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 156-163. https://doi.org/10.18503/1995-2732-2026-24-3-156-163
1. Wu B., Pan Z., Ding D., Cuiuri D., Li H., Xu J., Norrish J. A review of the wire arc additive manufacturing of metals: properties, defects and quality improvement. Journal of Manufacturing Processes. 2018;35:127-139. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro. 2018.08.001.
2. Ding D., Pan Z., Cuiuri D., Li H. A multi-bead overlapping model for robotic wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM). Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing. 2015;31:101-110.
3. Kah P., Latifi H., Suoranta R., Martikainen J., Pirinen M. Usability of arc types in industrial welding. International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering. 2014;9(1):15. doi:10.1186/s40712-014-0015-6.
4. Xiong J., Zhang G., Hu J. et al. Bead geometry prediction for robotic GMAW-based rapid manufacturing through a neural network and a second-order regression analysis. J Intell Manuf. 2014;25:157-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-012-0682-1.
5. Shevchik S.A., Kenel C., Leinenbach C., Wasmer K. Acoustic emission for in situ quality monitoring in additive manufacturing using spectral convolutional neural networks. Additive Manufacturing. 2017;27:598-604. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.11.012.
6. Zhang C., Chen F., Huang Z., Jia M., Chen G., Ye Y., Lin Y., Liu W., Chen B., Shen Q., Zhang L., Lavernia E.J. Additive manufacturing of functionally graded materials: A review. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2019;764:138209.
7. Youheng F et al. Optimization of surface appearance for wire and arc additive manufacturing of Bainite steel. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017;91(1-4):301-313.
8. Wang Z., Palmer T.A., Beese A.M. Effect of processing parameters on microstructure and tensile properties of austenitic stainless steel 304L made by directed energy deposition additive manufacturing. Acta Materialia. 2016;110:226-235. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.019.
9. Mukherjee T., Zuback J.S., De A., DebRoy T. Printability of alloys for additive manufacturing. Scientific Reports. 2016;6(1):19717. DOI:10.1038/srep19717.
10. Vencl A., Vučetić F., Bobić B., Pitel J., Bobić I. Tribological characterisation in dry sliding conditions of compocasted hybrid A356/SiCp/Grp composites with graphite macroparticles. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2019;100:2135-2146.
11. Wang C., Tan X.P., Tor S.B., Lim C.S. Machine learning in additive manufacturing: State-of-the-art and perspectives. Additive Manufacturing. 2020;36:101538. DOI:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101538
12. Liu S., Shin Y.C. Additive manufacturing of Ti6Al4V alloy: A review. Materials & Design. 2018;164:107552. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.107552.

