DOI: 10.18503/1995-2732-2026-24-3-82-92
Abstract
In modern quantitative metallography, the development of objective methods for assessing the complexity and morphology of the microstructure of metallic materials based on digital image analysis is an important task. Traditional methods of visual analysis largely depend on the subjective interpretation of the researcher, which limits the reproducibility of the results. In this regard, the application of fractal analysis methods is a promising approach, as they make it possible to describe the geometric complexity of microstructural elements using quantitative parameters. The aim of this study is to investigate the potential of fractal dimension for the quantitative characterization of the microstructure of various steel grades using digital micrographs. The materials investigated are steels 20Kh13, U10A, 50, and 12Kh18N10T. Image processing and fractal dimension calculations have been performed using fractal analysis methods, including the differential box-counting method implemented in the developed software (Computer Program Registration Certificate No. RU 2024660065), as well as the classical box-counting algorithm implemented in MATLAB R2021b. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the comparative application of different algorithms for calculating fractal dimension to digital images of steel microstructures and in the interpretation of the obtained values from the perspective of the physics of metals. It has been shown that the fractal dimension values reflect the morphological features of microstructural elements, including grain boundaries, carbide precipitates, and martensitic structures. The results demonstrate the feasibility of using fractal analysis to move from qualitative descriptions of microstructure to quantitative parameters. The practical significance of the study lies in the potential application of the proposed approaches to the automation of metallographic analysis, quality control of materials, and investigation of structure-property relationships.
Keywords
fractal dimension, steel microstructure, digital metallography, differential box-counting method, quantitative image analysis, metals science, physics of metals.
For citation
Bashkov A.A., Anosov M.S., Ivanov S.V., Bazhenov E.O., Akulova A.A., Chichevatov A.V. Methods for Calculating Fractal Dimension from Digital Microstructure Images for Quantitative Metallography. Vestnik Magnitogorskogo Gosudarstvennogo Tekhnicheskogo Universiteta im. G.I. Nosova [Vestnik of Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University]. 2026, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 82-92. https://doi.org/10.18503/1995-2732-2026-24-3-82-92
1. Chermant J.L., Coster M. Quantitative fractography. J Mater Sci. 1979;14:509-534. DOI: 10.1007/BF00772710.
2. Xue G., Fu Q., Xu S., Li J. Macroscopic mechanical properties and microstructure characteristics of steel slag fine aggregate concrete. Journal of Building Engineering. 2022;56:104742. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104742.
3. Procter R.P.M, Bob Cottis, Michael Graham, Robert Lindsay, Stuart Lyon, Tony Richardson, David Scantlebury, Howard Stott. Outline of structural metallurgy relevant to corrosion. Shreir's Corrosion. Elsevier, 2010, pp. 52-76. DOI: 10.1016/B978-044452787-5.00201-8.
4. Gupta S., Sarkar J., Kundu M., Bandyopadhyay N., Ganguly S. Automatic recognition of SEM microstructure and phases of steel using LBP and random decision forest operator. Measurement. 2020;151:107224. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107224.
5. Garashchenko Ya., Glushko A., Kobet O., Harashchenko O. Fractal analysis of structural and phase changes in the metal of welded steam pipe joints. 2021. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-77719-7_4.
6. Xi Y., Wang H., Li J., Dong W., Li H., Guo B. Experimental comparison of mechanical properties and fractal characteristics of geothermal reservoir rocks after different cooling treatments. Energy Reports. 2022;8:5158-5176. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.03.207.
7. Krajewski S., Nowacki J. Dual-phase steels microstructure and properties consideration based on artificial intelligence techniques. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering. 2014;14:278-286. DOI: 10.1016/j.acme.2013.10.002.
8. Dutta T., Das D., Banerjee S., Saha S.K., Datta S. An automated morphological classification of ferrite-martensite dual-phase microstructures. Measurement. 2019;137:595-603. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.12.106.
9. Dutta S., Karmakar A., Roy H., Barat K. Automatic estimation of mechanical properties from fractographs using optimal anisotropic diffusion and Voronoi tessellation. Measurement. 2019;134:574-585. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.10.100.
10. Soni S., Tiwari A., Singh R.N. Quantitative fractography in the DBT regime of 9Cr-1Mo ferritic/martensitic steel. Procedia Structural Integrity. 2025;68:513-519. DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2025.06.090.
11. Wang H., Liu Y., Song Y., Zhao Y., Zhao J., Wang D. Fractal analysis and its impact factors on pore structure of artificial cores based on the images obtained using magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Applied Geophysics. 2012;86:70-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.07.015.
12. Chen Y., Tang H., Zheng M., Li C., Zhao S., Zhao N., Leng Y. Fractal characteristics and significance of different pore types of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation, Southern Sichuan Basin, China, based on N2 adsorption and image analysis. ACS Omega. 2021;6(46):30889-30900. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c02539.
13. Fu H., Wang W., Chen X., Pia G., Li J. Grain boundary design based on fractal theory to improve intergranular corrosion resistance of TWIP steels. Materials & Design. 2020;185:108253. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108253.
14. Zeng Q., Chen Y., Yang Z., Zhang L., Wang Z., Wang L., Li J., Wang J. Effect of grain size and grain boundary type on intergranular stress corrosion cracking of austenitic stainless steel: A phase-field study. Corrosion Science. 2024;241:112557. DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2024.112557.
15. Brackmann L., Wingender D., Weber S., Balzani D., Röttger A. Influence of hard phase size and spacing on the fatigue crack propagation in tool steels - Numerical simulation and experimental validation. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 2023;46(10):3872-3891. DOI: 10.1111/ffe.14107.
16. Soto R., Saikaly W., Bano X., Issartel C., Rigaut G., Charai A. Statistical and theoretical analysis of precipitates in dual-phase steels microalloyed with titanium and their effect on mechanical properties. Acta Materialia. 1999;47(12):3475-3481. DOI: 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00190-1.
17. Ren Y., Li S., Feng S., Li Y., Yuan C. In situ EBSD observation and numerical simulation of microstructure evolution and strain localization of DP780 dual-phase steel. Materials. 2025;18:426. DOI: 10.3390/ma18020426.
18. Grassberger P. On efficient box counting algorithms. International Journal of Modern Physics. 1993;4(3):515-523.
19. Hilders O.A., Zambrano N., Caballero R. Microstructure, strength, and fracture topography relations in AISI 316L stainless steel, as seen through a fractal approach and the Hall-Petch law. International Journal of Metals. 2015;624653:10. DOI: 10.1155/2015/624653.
20. Martsepp M., Laas T., Laas K., Priimets J., Tõkke S., Mikli V. Dependence of multifractal analysis parameters on the darkness of a processed image. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. 2022;156:111811. DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111811.
21. Chumak O.V. Entropii i fraktaly v analize dannykh [Entropies and fractals in data analysis]. Moscow; Izhevsk: SRC Regular and Chaotic Dynamics, Institute of Computer Research Publishing House, 2011, 164 p. (In Russ.)
22. Bassi A., Bodas S.T., Hasan S.S., Sidhu G., Srinivasan S. Predictive modeling of hardness values and phase fraction percentages in micro-alloyed steel during heat treatment using AI. Metals. 2024;14:49. DOI: 10.3390/met14010049.
23. Kabaldin Yu.G. Digital materials science. Prediction of the structure and mechanical properties of new materials. Vestnik mashinostroeniya [Vestnik of mechanical engineering]. 2025;104(4):344-349. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.36652/0042-4633-2025-104-4-344-349. EDN TPBBKV.

