DOI: 10.18503/1995-2732-2026-24-3-5-13
Abstract
In the mining and metallurgical industry (MMI), operations in confined spaces (underground workings, process equipment, and utility systems) are associated with a high incidence of occupational injuries (mortality rates 3-5 times higher than the industrial average) and significant economic losses due to equipment downtime (20-30% of the available operating time). Existing robotic solutions are insufficiently adapted to conditions characterized by sensor-deprived environments, high dust levels, and dynamic changes in the operating environment. The aim of this study is to develop the conceptual foundations, architecture, and scientific and methodological framework (including formal models) for the creation of situation-adaptive mobile autonomous platforms (SAMPs) designed to perform tasks safely and efficiently in confined spaces within the MMI. The research methods include a systematic analysis of occupational injury statistics and economic losses, the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) methodology for formalizing requirements, simulation modeling using digital twins (Unity and Unreal Engine with PhysX), laboratory prototyping on “artificial mine” and “thermobaric chamber” test benches, and field testing at industrial facilities. The scientific novelty lies in proposing the concept of SAMPs based on the principles of modularity, contextual autonomy, and deep cyber-physical integration; developing a hybrid SLAM model for navigation in sensor-deprived environments (a positioning error of 0.8m over 500m compared with 4.2m when using lidar alone); and developing an energy consumption model that optimizes fuel costs and battery degradation. As a result, typical confined spaces in the MMI have been systematized and requirements for the platforms have been formalized. It is demonstrated that the implementation of SAMPs can reduce occupational injuries in target operations by 70-90%, increase productivity by 15-25%, and reduce repair costs by 25-40%. The payback period for a fleet of five platforms is estimated at 2.5-3 years. The practical significance of the study lies in providing MMI enterprises with a structured methodology for transitioning to robotic execution of operations in confined spaces. Further development should include experimental validation using full-scale prototypes, development of self-learning algorithms for semantic defect analysis, and the establishment of industry-specific standards for data exchange with digital twins.
Keywords
mobile autonomous platform, confined space, mining and metallurgical industry, situation adaptivity, mathematical model, total cost of ownership, industrial safety
For citation
Pashko A.D., Velikanov V.S., Bulganina M.Yu. Development of the Concept of Situation-Adaptive Mobile Autonomous Platforms for Confined Spaces in the Mining and Metallurgical Industry. Vestnik Magnitogorskogo Gosudarstvennogo Tekhnicheskogo Universiteta im. G.I. Nosova [Vestnik of Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University]. 2026, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 5-13. https://doi.org/10.18503/1995-2732-2026-24-3-5-13
1. Rostekhnadzor. Statisticheskie dannye o proizvodstvennom travmatizme za 2020-2022 gody [Statistical data on occupational injuries for 2020–2022]. Available at: https://www.gosnadzor.ru/ (Accessed on October 15, 2023).
2. Occupational safety rules for work in confined and enclosed spaces. Approved by Order No. 902n of the Ministry of Labor of Russia dated December 15, 2020.
3. Karpushin A.V., Frolov M.S. Economics of digital transformation of a mining enterprise: assessment of downtime losses. Gornyi zhurnal [Mining Journal]. 2022;(5):67-73. (In Russ.)
4. Thrun S., Burgard W., Fox D. Probabilistic Robotics. MIT Press, 2005, 647 p.
5. Pfeiffer M., Haghani T. Robotics for Mining: A Systematic Literature Review and TCO Analysis. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment. 2023;37(3):189-215.
6. Khamis A., Jiang J. Sensor Fusion and SLAM in Industrial Environments: Challenges and Solutions. Journal of Industrial Information Integration. 2022;28:100354.
7. Epiroc. Annual and Sustainability Report 2022: Driving Productivity and Sustainability. Available at: https://www.epiroc.com/ (Accessed on January 20, 2026).
8. Sandvik. AutoMine® Benchmarking Study: Productivity and Cost Analysis. Internal Report Summary, 2021.
9. Golovan V.I., Semenov D.A. Modeling the dynamics of a mobile robot in complex terrain environments. Inzhenernyi vestnik [Engineering Vestnik]. 2021;(4):45-52. (In Russ.)
10. Brooks R.A. A Robust Layered Control System for a Mobile Robot. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation. 1986; RA-2(1):14-23.
11. Saveliev A.I., Kharkov I.Yu., Pavlyuk N.A., Karpov A.A. Modulnaya mobilnaya robototekhnicheskaya platforma [Modular mobile robotic platform]. Patent RU, no. 2704048 C1, 2019.
12. Smith J., Chen L. Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Analysis for Industrial Robotics. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing. 2023;79:102443.

